By Quentin Langley
It was no surprise to see that BP had fallen out of Interbrand’s top 100 brands this year – until we look at the methodology in a little more detail. It turns out that this year’s rankings were all based on data from calendar year 2009. The disasters of this summer did not contribute to this decline at all. No doubt they will contribute to a further decline next year.
BP has been falling in the Interbrand survey since 2007 – based, of course, on 2006 data. So the decline in BP’s brand presaged the confused and incoherent handling of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
Interbrand’s Tom Zara told Brandjack News that the main factors behind BP’s decline were a lack of brand responsiveness and a lack of clarity around the brand’s values. Zara believes that Tony Hayward’s leadership of the oil giant was in stark contrast with that of Lord Browne. (Though, in fairness, we should note that Browne was still CEO throughout 2006). Zara also stressed that this was “not a category erosion.” Other energy companies, including Shell, have been moving up as BP has been moving down.
Zara is clear that there has been a “shift in values” at BP over the past few years, leaving the brand rather weaker than at the time of the ‘Beyond Petroleum’ rebrand. “The momentum of a brand can be measured over time,” stressed Zara. It seems that for BP that momentum has been downwards for some years. And it is doubtful that the decline is over yet.
Click here to read the Interbrand report.
Leave a comment