• Brandjack Editor, Quentin Langley, is available to speak at business conferences and seminars.  A practised public speaker over a period of 30 years experience Quentin can speak on a range of issues relating to brandjacking and public relations.  

    Possible subjects include:

    • Brandjacking by disaffected customers – what to look out for and how to handle the situation,

    • Where BP went wrong, and how it could have handled things better.

    • Environmental campaigners – how social media will challenge your business model

    • Transforming your business for the social media world.

    Contact Quentin Langley on editor@quentinlangley.net or on +44 7957 421338

  • By Quentin Langley


    How do extremists manage to brandjack religions and countries? Let us take Pastor Terry Jones. While it is possible to criticise the MSM for reporting plans by the obscure leader of a few dozen people to burn the Koran, politicians have now played into his hands. President Obama made a completely absurd statement talking about how “we” don’t desecrate other people’s holy texts because it is not what “we” stand for. Why is he associating a silly publicity stunt by one man with the policy of the United States – with what the United States ‘stands for’? His deft handling of his campaign has not been carried forward into office. He seems unready for prime time.


    How did one insignificant pastor become the voice of America, and why is the President presenting him as such by talking about his action as one that “we” don’t do? Why would the president participate in such brandjacking.


    Continue reading this story

  • How do extremists manage to brandjack religions and countries?  Let us take Pastor Terry Jones.  While it is possible to criticise the MSM for reporting plans by the obscure leader of a few dozen people to burn the Koran, politicians have now played into his hands.  President Obama made a completely absurd statement talking about how “we” don’t desecrate other people’s holy texts because it is not what “we” stand for.  Why is he associating a silly publicity stunt by one man with the policy of the United States – with what the United States ‘stands for’?  His deft handling of his campaign has not been carried forward into office.  He seems unready for prime time.

    How did one insignificant pastor become the voice of America, and why is the President presenting him as such by talking about his action as one that “we” don’t do?  Why would the president participate in such brandjacking.

    Meanwhile there are people objecting to an Islamic cultural center being built a couple of blocks from Ground Zero because a mosque would be seen as a ‘victory’ by al Qaeda.   Except that there doesn’t seem to be any connection at all between the Islamic cultural center and al Qaeda.  How did Islam allow itself to be brandjacked by al Qaeda?  

    In part some of these misunderstandings arise because Islam is not a centralised religion in the way that some Christian churches – Catholicism, for example – are.  There is no central leadership of Islam to declare where Islam stands corporately in relation to al Qaeda.  While it is easy for any journalist to find a self appointed imam to condemn bin Laden, it is equally easy to find another to praise him.

    It is not easy to see how ‘Islam’ can distance itself from al Qaeda, but the US government could easily – and much more effectively – distance itself from Pastor Terry Jones.  They could just shrug and say “he’s one guy and it’s just a book”.

  • Ever said anything you later regretted?  Ever done something a bit silly, in the heat of the moment, when you were 22?  

    Everyone has, of course.  But when I was 22, no-one was actually listening to me.  In part that is because the technology to easily and cheaply broadcast my stupidity around the world did not exist.  In part it is because I am neither an athlete nor an entertainer – to name two professions where people often obtain fame and notoriety at a very early age.  In PR terms, no celebrity is ever off-duty these days.

    Stephanie Rice – an Olympic swimming champion – has learnt this lesson, and at a considerable cost.  Before she used a homophobic term in her Tweet about an Australian rugby victory over South Africa she had a sponsorship agreement with Jaguar, and the use of one of the luxury cars that comes with such an arrangement.  Though she rapidly apologised and deleted the Tweet, what would once have been just a yell – and perhaps (though I wouldn’t know) a drunken yell – at a TV screen, became something that was broadcast to the world.

    At that moment, the narrative shifted.  She brandjacked herself.  She was no longer the clean-living Olympian with which any aspirational brand would wish to be associated but a loud-mouthed homophobe.  Not the sophisticated image one associates with Jaguar.

    I wish to cast no aspersions on Jaguar, or its ethics.  This was, plainly, a terrible thing for Rice to say, and Jaguar would, under the best of circumstances have been wise to cut their ties with her.  But she should, perhaps, have been particularly careful under current circumstances.  She is presently injured, and has already pulled out of the Commonwealth Games in Dehli.  She is, quite simply, a less valuable commodity than she was when she signed the deal with Jaguar.  Again, I should stress that, if I had been advising Jaguar, I would have strongly suggested terminating the deal anyway.  But she should have realised that now is not the time to be taking risks.

    Is there a way back for Rice?  Of course there is.  But the road may be long.  When her compatriot, Jason Donovan, alienated colleagues in the music business by claiming that calling him ‘queer’ was defamatory he found himself persona non grata.  It was – in the pre-social media world – a form of brandjacking, and became the only thing people ever said about him.  On the satirical British show,Have I Got News for You?  (Americans should think of the NPR show, Wait, wait, don’t tell me) Paul Merton and Ian Hislop consistently referred to Donovan as “the totally heterosexual Jason Donovan”.  

    Donovan rebuilt his career from the bottom up, by returning to the stage.  After years of re-earning his profile he finally returned to acting and singing on TV.  But it was a long road.  I think some years of quietly performing voluntary work for charity are in store for Ms Rice.

  • By Quentin Langley

    Ever said anything you later regretted?  Ever done something a bit silly, in the heat of the moment, when you were 22?  

    Everyone has, of course.  But when I was 22, no-one was actually listening to me.  In part that is because the technology to easily and cheaply broadcast my stupidity around the world did not exist.  In part it is because I am neither an athlete nor an entertainer – to name two professions where people often obtain fame and notoriety at a very early age.  In PR terms, no celebrity is ever off-duty these days.

    Stephanie Rice – an Olympic swimming champion – has learnt this lesson, and at a considerable cost.

    Continue reading this story

  • By Quentin Langley

    Pakistan is facing one of the worst natural disasters in history. The numbers affected exceed those hit by the Haiti earthquake, the Indian Ocean tsunami and the 2005 Kashmir earthquake combined.  The Pakistani government is engaged in desperate appeals for government to government aid.  The major charities are throwing themselves into huge fund-raising efforts. 

    Even before today's (29 August) cricket scandal some people were hesitant about giving money.  Some Pakistani expatriates in the UK have expressed reluctance to send money to Pakistan, fearing that the money would be wasted or stolen.  Today's cricket scandal is a disaster in terms of Pakistani branding.

    Cricket is not just a sport for Pakistan.  It is almost the only field of endeavour in which the country is genuinely world class.  At just the time when Pakistan needs the confidence of the world to raise money for the flooding disaster, the country has been brandjacked by a betting scandal.

    At the time of writing, no Pakistani player has been arrested.  However, a middleman does seem to have been arrested, and it is difficult to see how he can have entered into a conspiracy with anyone other than team players.

    To put it bluntly, these criminal allegations will impact donations to the disaster appeal.  Pakistan will not only lose a cricket match, millions will die from this scandal.

  • By Quentin Langley


    Apple is a cult company – a tribal brand. It has passionate support in terms of depth, if not always in breadth. As the only slightly cynical Courtney Thorpe put it in a post on Gizmodo “You Apple fan-boys . . . Apple could put out a brick and tell you it’s an iPhone, and you would buy it”. When Apple messes up, it’s a big problem for the brand.


    The iPhone 4 antenna problem was mishandled by Apple, and badly so. It may even have revealed a problem which goes to the heart of the company’s business model. The first word that most people associate with Apple products is ‘cool’. This is far from a bad thing, and it is not to say that Apple has not been a technical innovator, it has. But it is more Mercedes Benz than Ford. Apple’s early adoption of the use of icons, mouse-controls, pull down menus, etc. did not change computing. It is when Microsoft mass produced these things that the world began to change. The real marker of Apple products is not that they are better than those of their competitors, it is that they are cooler. This, rather than product performance, is the real USP.


    Continue reading this story

  • Apple is a cult company – a tribal brand.  It has passionate support in terms of depth, if not always in breadth.  As the only slightly cynical Courtney Thorpe put it in a post on Gizmodo “You Apple fan-boys . . . Apple could put out a brick and tell you it’s an iPhone, and you would buy it”.  When Apple messes up, it’s a big problem for the brand.

    The iPhone 4 antenna problem was mishandled by Apple, and badly so.  It may even have revealed a problem which goes to the heart of the company’s business model.  The first word that most people associate with Apple products is ‘cool’.  This is far from a bad thing, and it is not to say that Apple has not been a technical innovator, it has.  But it is more Mercedes Benz than Ford.  Apple’s early adoption of the use of icons, mouse-controls, pull down menus, etc. did not change computing.  It is when Microsoft mass produced these things that the world began to change.  The real marker of Apple products is not that they are better than those of their competitors, it is that they are cooler.  This, rather than product performance, is the real USP.

    This is where the iPhone 4 problem becomes critical.  According to Bloomberg, Apple engineers identified problems with iPhone 4 antenna in 2009, and alerted CEO, Steve Jobs, at the time.  This is worrying, because Apple at first insisted that there was no real problem, or at least nothing that wasn’t common to all smart phones.  The company later conceded that there was a problem, and offered a free fix.  But there is worse to come.  Apple angrily denied Bloomberg’s story to the Wall Street Journal, but Journal sources confirmed that Apple knew about the problem a year before it admitted them, but Jobs overruled the engineers because he liked the design.

    If true, this goes to the heart of Apple’s business model.  If there is a conflict between cool and product performance, and Apple prefers cool, this will shake the loyalty of the most devoted fans.

    And it is the nature of Apple’s products that they are particularly vulnerable to their image in social media.  They are not selling SAGA holidays or Stannah stairlifts.  Their customers are big-time users of social media.

    The excellent Mike Regester, of Regester Larkin, offers three rules of crisis management: “Tell the truth; tell it all;  tell it now”.  Apple, perhaps more than most companies, cannot afford to break those rules.  Like a jilted lover, those ‘fan-boys’ could make the short leap from love to hate.

    Apple needs to tread very carefully.  Any further errors on this scale will lead to the company being torn apart right across social media.

  • By Quentin Langley

    In an excellent piece of brandjacking, Barfly has been having fun with Barclays, the sponsors of London’s new cycle scheme.

    Brandjacking deluxe! The Mayor's cycle scheme is certain... on Twitpic


    This is an interesting example of a brandjack, as it is not clear it necessarily harms Barclays. That is not the point. The point is some cheeky coverage for Barfly. If these photos keep circulating on social media and even the MSM it will earn some profile for both parties. What Barclays has to do is to make sure they don’t come off as pompous in their response. If they are straight on the phone to m’learned friends, they will alienate the social media community.


    By the way, this excellent photo on Twitpic is to the credit of top class PR pro Henriette Svensen, a follower of Brandjack News and its Linked In group.
    http://twitpic.com/2hiy5f

  • By Quentin Langley


    The problem with the social web is that cringeworthy misjudgements that used to just entertain a few of your friends and colleagues can now leave you exposed to the amusement of half the world.

    Take this example (h/t @Sheldrake) from Bank of America.


    Continue reading this story